Membership Rates to Increase in 2023
Dear NACC Members,
Hello, we hope this season brings long overdue time off with family and friends, for fun, rest, reflection, and rejuvenation.
Because we appreciate your engagement, we wanted to let you know, sooner than later, there will be an increase in membership rates starting in January 2023. NACC has kept its membership rates low and flat for over a decade. As required by NACC bylaws, a 25% increase has been approved by the Executive Committee, as well as the Finance Committee, of the NACC Board of Directors. View the table at the end of this email to see individual and organizational member rates for 2023.
In recent years, NACC has invested substantial resources to improve member benefits – developing a monthly member webinar series, improving and expanding The Guardian, building a Conference Resource Library, moving to a new listserv platform, and now we are building a new website and member portal. NACC also offers member discounts on all NACC products and events, including conferences. And we know from our recent member survey you would like to see even MORE resources – more tools, more trainings, and better-archived material – we’re already working on it!
Although we are raising membership rates, we want to support you as best as we can. NACC will continue to offer 25% off membership during our spring sale every April, and during our organizational sale every February. The cost of membership dues for individuals can be paid monthly or over four installments. NACC is also introducing an early career-level membership rate in 2023.
To save money on next year’s membership, you can renew your membership now at 2022 pricing and add an additional 12 months to your renewal.
This is a great time to become a Silver, Gold, or Sapphire member at 2022 rates AND get a free copy of the new 4th Edition Red Book! You can lock-in your rate in even longer with a 3-year Bronze, Silver, or Gold Membership. For an organization with multiple staff, an organizational membership may be the most economical. Or you can join NACC for life at the Platinum level and never pay dues again.
Please see NACC’s website for a full list of membership benefits at each level.
Whether or not you extend your membership early, all NACC members get a discount on the NEW 4th Edition Red Book. Through the end of the year, NACC members get 20% off 4th Edition pricing, and CWLS get 25% off 4th Edition pricing. Click here for more information on Red Book 4.
At NACC,your practice is our purpose. We will continue to build resources to support your advocacy and your career and can’t wait to launch our new website this March! Thank you for being a part of the NACC community – it’s the number one reason your colleagues have joined alongside you. We are NACC. Together we are Promoting Excellence, Building Community, and Advancing Justice.
Kim Dvorchak, Executive Director
Emily Dufour, Membership Coordinator
UPDATE: Supreme Court Oral Argument on ICWA November 9
Brackeen v. Haaland
Listen to Supreme Court oral argumentson November 9, 2022.
On April 6, 2021, the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Congress had the authority to enact ICWA. The en banc court held that the “Indian Child” designation and, the portions of a Final Rule issued in 2016 by the Department of the Interior that implement it, were based on a political classification; thus, they did not violate the Equal Protection Clause. The court also held that “§ 1915(c) does not violate the nondelegation doctrine because the provision is either a valid prospective incorporation by Congress of another sovereign’s law or a delegation of regulatory authority.” Additionally, the court found that the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) “acted within its statutory authority in issuing binding regulations” and “did not violate the APA when it changed its position on the scope of its authority because the agency provided a reasonable explanation for its new stance.”
While the court upheld the constitutionality of several ICWA provisions, it declared that three provisions were unconstitutional under the anti-commandeering doctrine: active efforts requirement in § 1912(d); qualified expert witness requirement in § 1912 (e) and (f); and placement-record requirement in § 1915(e). Furthermore, the court ruled that the Final Rule “violated the APA to the extent it implemented these unconstitutional provisions”; thus, these parts of the Final Rule are no longer applicable to the states in the Fifth Circuit (Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi): 25 C.F.R. § 23.132(b) (that good cause to deviate from the placement preferences must be shown by clear and convincing evidence) and 25 C.F.R. § 23.141 (record keeping). A resource to better understand the decision’s impact can be found here.
Haaland v. Brackeen
U.S. Supreme Court Petition for Certiorari
On September 3, 2021, the individual plaintiffs, the State of Texas, the Solicitor General, and intervening tribal nations filed petitions for certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court. On October 8, 2021, NACC joined with partners in an amicus brief supporting the Indian Child Welfare Act and opposing the attack on Indigenous sovereignty & families. On February 28, 2022, the Supreme Court accepted cert of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court Merits Stage Amicus Brief
On August 18, 2022, NACC, along with thirty children’s rights organizations, filed an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to uphold the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). At the outset, amici assert that “ICWA establishes minimum federal standards consistent with constitutional requirements applicable to state welfare proceedings that ensure the system protects the well-being of children when state intervention is necessary.” Amici emphasize that the Constitution protects the right to family integrity and requires that children are only removed from their home when they are unsafe. “ICWA protects families from ‘unwarranted’ removals . . . by establishing standards and procedures designed to ensure that Indian children are removed from their parents only when necessary to safeguard them from serious harm, and that families are reunified when possible.” Amici argue that when removals are necessary, ICWA’s placement preferences ensure that Indian children maintain familial relationships, preserve their culture and traditions, and stay connected to their Tribe.
Amici maintain that ICWA is consistent with the best interest analysis that state courts undertake; when making best interest determinations, state courts consider certain factors which “align with ICWA’s fundamental principles: preserving family integrity, prioritizing placement with relatives, and maintaining community and culture.” Furthermore, amici point out that several states, recognizing that ICWA serves the best interest of children, have codified key provisions of ICWA into state law. ICWA provides critical information and support (from tribal advocates and expert witnesses) that state courts may not otherwise have available when making best interest determinations, due to the challenges that state child welfare systems, including the plaintiff State of Texas, face. For these reasons, amici urge the Supreme Court to uphold ICWA. The case is under review by the Supreme Court, and oral arguments are slated for November.
NACC is grateful to the following organizational partners who collaborated on and joined this brief:
- Alliance for Children’s Rights
- Barton Child Law and Policy Center, Emory Law School
- Center for Children & Youth Justice
- Children’s Law Center
- Children’s Law Center of California
- Children’s Law Center of Massachusetts, Inc.
- Children’s Law Center of Minnesota
- Children’s Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan
- Children’s Legal Services of San Diego
- Children’s Permanency Clinic, St. Louis University School of Law
- Children’s Rights, Inc.
- Colorado Office of the Child’s Representative
- East Bay Children’s Law Offices
- Juvenile Law Center
- Lawyers For Children
- Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada Children’s Attorneys Project
- Legal Aid Society of Palm Beach County
- Legal Counsel for Youth and Children
- Massachusetts Committee for Public Counsel Services
- Minnesota Guardian ad Litem
- National Center for Youth Law
- New Jersey Office of the Public Defender, Office of the Law Guardian
- Pima County Office of Children’s Counsel
- Public Counsel
- Rocky Mountain Children’s Law Center
- Southeast Louisiana Legal Services
- Virginia Poverty Law Center
- Youth Law Center
Corey Best and Ivory Bennett Introductory Chapter to the forthcoming NACC 4th Edition Red Book
JUSTICE AS THE THROUGH LINE
An Introduction to the forthcoming NACC 4th Edition Child Welfare Law and Practice (“Red Book”)
Ivory K. Bennett
Corey B. Best
Recording of Featured Address by Ivory Bennett and Corey Best at NACC’s 45th National Child Welfare Law Conference Here
In our culture, neighborhoods, and brave, liberated spaces, we share abundantly about the prolonged, traumatic impacts that punitive and carceral systems have had on our bodies and minds. Our Black bodies. Our Black minds. In our current child welfare system, for many families like ours, the severity of exposure to child protective services (CPS) is life or death. Just look at Ma’khia Bryant’s and Cornelius Fredericks’s cases—where family regulatory practice resulted in literal death. What we refer to as life or death here is that with one roll of the proverbial dice, lifelines are too often lost. Not given. Not forgiven. Just lost. From our collective experiences, we have observed intentionally ruptured familial bonds. And through it all, the most impacted are expected to be parented by an abusive system that demands that they sit down, shut up, be quiet.
Within this brief introduction, we will demonstrate what we mean by effective legal representation. We offer lawyers and judges a view into our world and challenge you to question what legacy building means to you. To start, we must face a few realities that you have been witness to and may have been active in perpetuating. We mean pain, cuts, wounds, and scars that we have been taught to disregard. We understand fully that we have an experience that many of you who are reading this can attest to only from the position of the “spectator.” Or maybe, you watched us develop into tokens for systems change through storytelling and vulnerability—as if our lives were meant for some type of savage sport in an arena called the child welfare system. The environment where resolving matters of families and what matters to families is virtually impossible without effective legal representation or restorative justice practices. Where spectators take the form of social workers, child advocates, clinicians, law enforcement, attorneys, collaterals, guardians, and the one who might be the most visible, non-active onlooker of all—the judge.
You have built your careers in this arena. The place where your measurement of success is achieved through a dichotomous lens of either win or lose. Your practice ground is the life of the youth you represent whose voice is lost in the posturing of your advocacy. And for a parent with a child ensnarled in that arena, you, the attorney, speak because typically, a parent’s voice is better silenced out of a fear response that they might just tell it like it is. So, therefore, controlling and suppressing their voices is paramount. In both scenarios, you, the spectator, then take on the role of the oppressor. Your worldview of us has been formed from allegations, family functioning assessments, and historical descriptions that feed the memory of stereotypical Blackness. The lies the world has told you about families that look like ours are deeply entrenched in how you deliver your arguments, your positions, and your motions. Ultimately, these false narratives shape how you build relationships with families. How do we know? Your behaviors. And we want you to know that we see you.
It is time to become more than your position. It is time to become a liberated agent of law, justice, and humanity.
It is the worst of times. It is also a time of great and necessary changes for all. And although it would feel quite vindicating and, from our perspectives, justifiably warranted to burn it all down, many are calling for a more sustainable and radical approach across multiple decision points within the legal dependency system. We must reinvent legal representation to reflect modern times and modern needs—the system needs a true integration of justice-centered practices and liberated legislation that proactively strategizes with the totality of harms caused to historically and systemically oppressed groups of human beings.
We truly believe that the colonized dependency court system can be anything that judicial stewards actualize it to be—effective, restorative, just, and, most importantly, humane. We have experienced the American justice system to be anything that benefits White people in positions of power, at the expense of stripping constituents of their Fourteenth Amendment rights to family, humanity, and due process. However, for us, we hold enduring hope in a few individuals who demand that our child protection system keep the tokens and coins—and grant us change! We have hope in those who dare to fight for and provide equitable, effective, restorative legal representation. We have hope for those who openly acknowledge the need for our current justice system to be abolished—not to be replicated and reformed. After all, our Declaration of Independence states our right to abolish destructive governmental systems:
We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are . . . endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights. . . . To secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men. . . . That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to affect their Safety and Happiness. . . . Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while Evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the Forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
– Declaration of Independence (1776)
The solutions to our collective problems must equal the magnitude and severity of grievances expressed by families and communities ravaged by CPS. As we deepen the frame within this teaching tool, we encourage you to recognize that we have a set of lived-impacted credentials that remarkably qualify us to critique, love, and stand for justice.
Our core purpose is to ensure that justice-centered legal representation becomes an immovable marker of the quintessential, decolonized American child welfare system. The aim is to achieve a level of representation that has not existed since the inception of orphan trains, boarding schools, and “blue ribbon babies.” This next level of legal efficacy must be a true reflection of the gold that exists in every person, in every situation. Effective legal representation must be an equitable, dependable force that attends to victims of true abuse and neglect without punishing people for experiencing episodes of poverty. Legal representation must reflect the fruits of its labor—all people will be protected, defended, and uplifted at all costs. Lastly, effective legal representation must be proactive and restorative, in the most imaginative ways possible.
And for the children who have been taken and might find themselves lost in our life-or-death child welfare system, effective legal representation must be more akin to an unbreakable bond between a loving mother who will do anything to protect her children, at any expense, the protective father who devotes his time and energy to provide for all human needs, and the adoring family, community, and village who nurture, support, and defend always, in all ways. Our experience has taught us that punitive, governmental systems are not well suited to parent—families are!
Pause with us and journal:
1) In what ways are you equipped to acknowledge where you have caused harm?
2) Are you the right person for a world filled with restoration? What do you need to learn to engage with the entirety of those you represent?
We, the impacted—the children, the parents, the family members who have been told that they are not good enough, those of us who might find ourselves in need of support during perhaps the most difficult times of our lives—will lean into our collective truths. We, the impacted, call you to envision, to attach, and to feel the emotional turmoil and trauma that can be seen and unseen, expressed and suppressed, leading to enduring an unnatural childhood, a parenthood, or a family-hood dictated by the judiciary system. Such vestiges are reminiscent of the barbaric and peculiar institution of American chattel slavery, followed by another one hundred years of Jim Crow, that led to codifying humanity in 1964. The destruction of Black families has been far too normalized. Therefore, a new chapter is on the horizon.
We, the impacted, will become a part of building a society established by vivid clarity and one audacious dream that centers the expansiveness, liberty, and freedom of holistic happiness, radical representation, preserved family structures, and lasting legacies that lay the foundation for true self-actualization. We, the impacted, know who we are becoming—because we know where we have been.
We, the impacted, deserve the opportunities to manifest our becoming more than a data point, reach our standards of success, and be afforded the freedom to excel to our highest potential in anti-oppressive ways that humanize our personhood and uplift our magnificence. The suffering of children and families should never be excused away for any reason, and the systemic dependence on individual resiliency is negligent and lazy with chronic, cyclical consequences that ripple effortlessly through generations in degenerative, disparaging ways. For many persons with lived expertise, resiliency is not a choice. For many persons with lived experience, resiliency is survival—an unsustainable trauma response that highly activates the nervous systems. Over time, resiliency results in a myriad of physical, mental, emotional, and social effects that when left unaddressed can reduce one’s overall quality of life. Everything has a cost. Whether it be maladaptation, resiliency, or some combination of the two—child welfare practitioners and judicial stewards of the law must acknowledge the need for the dependency system to proactively protect those experiencing family disruptions and stop creating environments filled with trauma so that the only strength you acknowledge is resilience.
We, the impacted, ask you to stop causing harm. We, the impacted, want to know if you are willing to interrogate yourselves by asking:
1) Am I aware that my intention and my impact are not the same?
2) What type of human being do I need to be for the families that I represent?
3) How can I acknowledge the impact of my personal and professional practices while building power with those I serve?
In preparation for this piece, we recognized that during our evolution as the impacted, we have captured glimpses of liberation and moments of freedom. In essence, we have witnessed our power. Each of us has an individualized narrative comprising personal and collective experiences that shape the lens through which one navigates the world, work, and life. Intellectually, we know that our country was founded on stolen Indigenous land and the forced labor of kidnapped, enslaved Africans. This violent inception created the structure and organization of our exploitive, Eurocentric, capitalist-centered systems. Through the process of othering people, White, dominant ideology has set the stage for abusive power to be consumed and reproduced at an insidiously harmful rate. Without being proximate to people on a deep transformational footing, the baked-in anti-Blackness serves as justification to capitalize and exploit minoritized groups of people.
National data tells the story of racial disparity. But it does not tell the offensive story of racism. Racism is race plus prejudice plus power. Race has become the number one proxy for a lifetime trajectory of institutionalized injustice. The immense advantages, with institutional and societal consequences, of the benefactors of colonization and slavery are at the expense of the non-White groups of people. It is now your inheritance to bear the brunt of dismantling this oppressive judicial system designed and upheld in contemporary legal practice. Such a shift will be paramount in your practice with families.
The work of liberation and justice should not be viewed as hard, impossible, or tough. The work of justice should be viewed as necessary and obligatory. At every decision point, in contact with someone exposed to CPS, you have areas of discretion to drive proximity. It is your responsibility to grasp the reality that power is relational and who you choose to ascribe power to matters. To relinquish power, there must be a reciprocal vulnerability with people. Liberation, justice, and belonging are not always measurable, because they are traits that should be woven into the fabric of your everyday existence. Ask your client how they are experiencing you. You may find truer answers and glean more effective ways to allow them to be your mirror to your soul.
As you continue to travel, let’s consider:
1) In what ways am I showing up as the oppressor?
2) Do I hold onto my positional power to the point that I refuse to learn?
3) How often do I honor the power in people who don’t look like me?
By now, many of you might have observed that our position comes from a place driven by values and fueled by common purpose and passion. In brave spaces, not everything will be what you want it to be. And any space that is riddled with environmental threats to humanity cannot be considered safe. Additionally, you have witnessed scars of memory. In a system that wants us to remember their memories, our soul survival requires us to keep remembering ours. The hope is that you are activated and prepared to do better with the responsibility bestowed upon you. Being activated means that collectively, we must pivot from advocacy to action using shared values of effective legal representation, judicial leadership, and restorative justice as the lighthouse that steers us toward the shores of judicial liberation free of the bondage of institutionalized and systemic inequities.
In your approach to learning who you are, we strongly suggest that you rid yourselves of the “founding fathers” ideas of justice. Break free from being a spectator and become a more just and humane individual who stands on values and centers humanity in this work. We must realize that the need for the child welfare system is a direct result of historical and systemic legislative and societal norms that have separated, corroded, and obliterated both the individual and the collective. A fundamental shift in how we design our thinking between practitioners and clients is necessary to facilitate restorative justice through both intention and impact. Honoring the lived expertise of those impacted by the child welfare system and embracing those same individuals’ mastery and agency is necessary to redefine guiding principles and practices across all systemic levels.
Now is an unavoidable time for reinvention. And that reinvention begins with self. What can you do as an individual practitioner to create concrete restorative justices on micro and macro levels? The shift from injustice to restorative justice begins internally and moves outward. You are the holders, the keepers, and the defenders of our personal practices. You are the change we have been unknowingly pursuing.
Here are fifteen actions with which practitioners can LEAD:
a. The true history of America to understand the depths of institutionalized oppression and its traumatic impact on marginalized people.
b. About yourself and how you have directly caused harm.
c. What lies the world has told you about who you are and the systems that perpetuate these lies.
d. What a positive racial identity means to you.
a. The meaning of right and accountable relationships.
b. How those you work with and serve see you.
c. Someone else’s experiences—not as a spectator, but as a human being.
d. What anti-oppressive practice looks and feels like.
a. To intentionally seek areas where you have control and influence.
b. On all the small things that will inject humanity at decision points.
c. To include individuals with lived expertise at every level of the judicial system. Instead of talking about and theorizing on their wants and needs, create a permanent, respected, non-tokenized space so that we, the impacted, can be fully represented and present in change initiatives.
a. That liberation is freedom. And what it means to people, including you, when they can be themselves.
b. The importance and value of proximity and undeniable knowledge that come from direct, experiential learning and practice.
c. The infinite possibilities of humanity when true restorative justice is the center of judiciary practice.
d. Why you are so dependent on solving problems and less focused on creating possibilities.
We hope that you will journey with this message to prevent devaluing families and internalizing oppressive practices. We leave you with four essential questions to unpack and examine as only a reimagined human would:
1) What values do I center in my personal legal practice?
2) How do those values translate to action and advocacy?
3) Do I intentionally give higher priority to relationships with the most harmed than to holding relationships with systems of oppression?
4) How can I empower myself and support the values, actions, and agency of my clients in the most restoratively just, positively impactful, least invasive ways possible—individually and systemically?
 Ivory Bennett, M.Ed. is an educational leader, a national equity advocate for foster care and education, and an award-winning published author.
 Corey B. Best is a dedicated father, and the founder of Mining For Gold, the curator of community experiences. The Mining For Gold movement of longing for justice, liberation, and belonging is rooted in thinking culturally, not strategically.
Recentering NACC’s Strategy Consistent with Our Values and Commitments
In this 45th anniversary year, the NACC board, staff, and National Advisory Council on Children’s Legal Representation (NACCLR) reviewed and updated the organization’s strategic plan to reflect our current values and organizational commitments.
The NACC board adopted a five-year 2019-2023 Strategic Plan in 2018. At the time, the board and staff were primarily focused on NACC’s organizational development, growth, and fiscal sustainability. By the half-way point in our plan, NACC had successfully refocused our core programming, expanded our team, and strengthened our business model. NACC had also engaged in race equity training and launched NACC’s NACCLR, then known as NACC’s National Youth Advisory Board.
As 2020 unfolded, it became mission-critical to us that we needed to formally center race equity and constituent engagement in NACC’s mission, vision, and goals. From November 2021 to March 2022, the board, staff, and advisory council members engaged in a strategic plan refresh with the support of consultants from Community Wealth Partners, funded by the Annie E. Casey Foundation. NACC’s core programs remain the same, but our goals and purpose have shifted from accelerating growth to ensuring equity and inclusion across all areas of our work.
On April 30, 2022, the Board of Directors unanimously adopted the refreshed strategic plan:
NACC advances children’s and parents’ rights by supporting a diverse, inclusive community of child welfare lawyers to provide zealous legal representation and by advocating for equitable, anti-racist solutions co-designed by people with lived experience.
Every child, parent, and family is well-supported in their community and has equitable access to justice through culturally responsive, client-centered legal representation.
These values and priorities were then woven into revised organizational goals which remain anchored in NACC’s three-part strategy:
Increase and diversify the national community of Child Welfare Law Specialists.
Deliver timely, frequent, responsive, and updated trainings informed by constituent voice, including presenters with lived experience, and with a focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Publish the Fourth Edition of Child Welfare Law & Practice, the “Red Book,” re-envisioning the content and contributors and focusing on race equity, LGBTQIA justice, balancing new voices with expertise, and contributor diversity.
Increase support to a growing membership, with focus on increasing diversity, inclusion, and modernizing membership tools and resources for the field.
Utilize law school, State Coordinator, and board partnerships to expand member diversity and promote pipeline to and tenure in child welfare law profession.
Build a larger and more diverse conference attendance through scholarships and a variety of conference offerings.
Collaborate with individuals with lived experience to co-design policies, positions, assessments, and amicus briefs that advance NACC’s policy agenda.
Partner with NACC members and individuals with lived experience to refresh NACC’s policy agenda with a focus on race equity and constituent engagement.
Deploy digital and traditional communications that center the voices of people with lived experience; elevate NACC’s mission, policy positions, and expertise; emphasize equity and justice; and reach practitioners, youth, parents, families, policymakers, and the child welfare community.
With this refreshed plan, the NACC staff and board will hold itself accountable to authentically engaging experts with lived expertise as we work to build a more diverse, inclusive community of advocates advancing justice in the child welfare system. We look forward to sharing more with you as this work continues in the coming years.