M.D. v. Abbott: NACC joined partners to file an amicus brief in this appeal of a contempt order arising from a Texas class action case
Your Case, Your Rights: Your Guide to Exercising Self-Advocacy
In Re D.N. Dailey, Minor: NACC filed an amicus brief in Michigan regarding the federal law, research and best practices around legal guardianship.
In the Matter of Sapphire W.: NACC joined an amicus brief regarding the rights of non-respondent (“non-offending”) parents in child welfare cases.
In re A.H.: NACC filed an amicus brief arguing that the termination of the parent’s rights to their two youngest children was not strictly necessary to promote their best interest as they could have been placed in a guardianship with their older siblings at their grandparents’ home.
Closing the Justice Gap for Youth in the Foster Care to Prison Pipeline
Integrating Evaluations in Practice: Lessons Learned from Representing Survivors of CSEC within a Treatment Court Model—Materials
This content is only available to members.
State of Alaska, Department of Health and Social Services, et al. vs. Z.C., through his next friend, Lorenz Kaufman: NACC joined two amicus briefs arguing that due process requires the child welfare agency to provide foster youth with notice of the award of Social Security benefits, appointment as representative payee, and use of these benefits to cover foster care costs. (2/2)
State of Alaska, Department of Health and Social Services, et al. vs. Z.C., through his next friend, Lorenz Kaufman: NACC joined two amicus briefs arguing that due process requires the child welfare agency to provide foster youth with notice of the award of Social Security benefits, appointment as representative payee, and use of these benefits to cover foster care costs. (1/2)
Rockett v. Eighmy: NACC filed an amicus brief arguing that a family court judge, who detained siblings and threatened to place them in foster care because they did not want to live with their mother, is not entitled to judicial immunity.